Ap World History 2010 Q3 Free Essays

WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 †Comparative BASIC CORE (fitness) 0â€7 Points 1. Has worthy proposition. 1 Point †¢ The postulation must incorporate both a substantial similitude and a legitimate distinction in techniques for political control in two of the realms. We will compose a custom exposition test on Ap World History 2010 Q3 or then again any comparative subject just for you Request Now †¢ The proposition must be pertinent to the timespan, however the dates need not be express. †¢ The postulation must be expressly expressed in the presentation or the predetermined finish of the exposition. †¢ The proposal may show up as one sentence or as various sentences. †¢ A theory that is part among different sections or just rehashes the brief is unsatisfactory. The proposition CANNOT mean some other point. 2. Addresses all pieces of the inquiry, however not really equitably or altogether. 2 Points For 2 focuses: †¢ Identifies in any event one substantial similitude and one legitimate distinction in techniques for political control. †¢ Discusses two domains yet not really uniformly. For 1 point: †¢ Identifies in any event one substantial similitude or if nothing else one legitimate contrast in strategies for political control. †¢ Discusses two domains however not really equally. 3. Validates postulation with proper chronicled proof. 2 Points For 2 focuses: Must give in any event five explicit bits of proof (at any rate two from every realm). †¢ Evidence must be inside the assigned timespans (e. g. , proof from the Roman Republic or Qin line isn't satisfactory). For 1 point: †¢ Must give in any event three explicit bits of proof (at any rate one from every domain). †¢ Evidence must be inside the assigned timeframes. 4. Makes in any event one immediate, applicable correlation between/among social orders. 1 Point (The immediate examination may talk about either likenesses or contrasts. ) †¢ To acquire this point, the correlation must be made some place other than in the theory. . Examines in any event one purpose behind a similitude or a distinctio n distinguished in an immediate examination. †¢ Analysis (motivation behind why) must be identified with a similitude or a distinction in techniques for political control between the two realms. Subtotal 1 Point 7 Points  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. AP ® WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 †Comparative (proceeded) EXPANDED CORE (greatness) Expands past fundamental center of 1â€7 focuses. An understudy must acquire 7 focuses in the fundamental center region before winning focuses in the extended center territory. 0â€2 Points Models: †¢ Has a reasonable, expository and extensive postulation. †¢ Addresses all pieces of the inquiry completely (as pertinent): correlations, sequence, causation, associations, subjects, collaborations, content. †¢ Provides sufficient recorded proof to validate proposition. †¢ Relates correlations with bigger worldwide setting. †¢ Makes a few immediate, significant correlations between or among social orders. †¢ Consistently breaks down the circumstances and end results of important likenesses and contrasts. †¢ Applies significant information on different locales or world recorded procedures. †¢ Discusses change after some time (e. g. changing strategies for political control as the domains declined). †¢ Recognizes subtleties inside domains. Subtotal 2 Points TOTAL 9 Points  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. coll egeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. ollegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. AP ® WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING COMMENTARY Question 3 Overview The purpose of the inquiry was for understudies to pick two of the specified realms †Han China (206 B. C. E. to 220 C. E. ), Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B. C. E. to 550 C. E. ), Imperial Rome (31 B. C. E. to 476 C. E. ) †and look at the manners in which those realms applied political command over their peoples. Understudies were unequivocally advised to talk about the two similitudes and contrasts in techniques for political control. Test: 3A Score: 8 The article contains a substantial theory in the second and third sentences of the principal section (1 point). In the fourth passage, the exposition tends to a likeness (â€Å"Both domains had insecure borders†) and a few contrasts, including â€Å"However, Han China managed the Turkic Huns through the tribute frameworks, in this way mollifying them with endowments and keeping away from exorbitant costly fighting, which Rome favored when managing their enemies† (2 focuses). Despite the fact that there is plentiful proof for the Han, Roman proof is restricted by conversation of the Republic, which couldn't be checked. There is, in any case, enough proof for 2 proof focuses. Notwithstanding the immediate examination recorded above, there is another distinction at the base of the second section †â€Å"However, in light of the fact that there was less accentuation as an aggregate gathering in Rome, the political association was significantly less organized than China’s† †which earned 1 point for the correlation and 1 point on the grounds that the announcement additionally includes an investigation. This article contained an unpredictable theory, adequate profundity of examination, and supporting proof to acquire 1 Expanded Core point. Test: 3B Score: 6 This exposition contains a legitimate proposal in the principal passage (1 point) and addresses the two likenesses and contrasts (2 focuses). There is adequate proof for both the Mauryan/Gupta and the Han realms (2 focuses). The immediate correlation is found in the subsequent passage: â€Å"Han China and Maurya Gupta [sic] both solidified their capacity through military buildup† (1 point). The exposition endeavors examination in the close to the last section yet just dissects the Han: â€Å"Due to their absence of a dedicated religion, China had the option to absorb the Huns when they started to attack China. † There is no examination of a correlation of Han and Mauryan/Gupta strategies for political control. Test: 3C Score: 3 There is no substantial proposition in light of the fact that the exposition endeavors to show a contrast among Han and Rome as far as the Roman Republic, which is outside the timespan. The article just tends to likenesses, not substantial contrasts (1 point). The proof is adequate for the Han, yet the main legitimate bit of proof for Rome is the explanation that â€Å"He [Augustus] crushed Cleopatra and Mark Anthony ensuring that Rome is politically secured† (1 point). The greater part of the Roman proof is before 31 B. C. E. what's more, in this manner didn't acquire credit. The article has a substantial direct examination in the fourth passage: â€Å"The size of the two domains was an issue that prompted pioneers eventually losing political control of both empires† (1 point).  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. Step by step instructions to refer to Ap World History 2010 Q3, Papers