Ap World History 2010 Q3 Free Essays

WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 †Comparative BASIC CORE (fitness) 0â€7 Points 1. Has worthy proposition. 1 Point †¢ The postulation must incorporate both a substantial similitude and a legitimate distinction in techniques for political control in two of the realms. We will compose a custom exposition test on Ap World History 2010 Q3 or then again any comparative subject just for you Request Now †¢ The proposition must be pertinent to the timespan, however the dates need not be express. †¢ The postulation must be expressly expressed in the presentation or the predetermined finish of the exposition. †¢ The proposal may show up as one sentence or as various sentences. †¢ A theory that is part among different sections or just rehashes the brief is unsatisfactory. The proposition CANNOT mean some other point. 2. Addresses all pieces of the inquiry, however not really equitably or altogether. 2 Points For 2 focuses: †¢ Identifies in any event one substantial similitude and one legitimate distinction in techniques for political control. †¢ Discusses two domains yet not really uniformly. For 1 point: †¢ Identifies in any event one substantial similitude or if nothing else one legitimate contrast in strategies for political control. †¢ Discusses two domains however not really equally. 3. Validates postulation with proper chronicled proof. 2 Points For 2 focuses: Must give in any event five explicit bits of proof (at any rate two from every realm). †¢ Evidence must be inside the assigned timespans (e. g. , proof from the Roman Republic or Qin line isn't satisfactory). For 1 point: †¢ Must give in any event three explicit bits of proof (at any rate one from every domain). †¢ Evidence must be inside the assigned timeframes. 4. Makes in any event one immediate, applicable correlation between/among social orders. 1 Point (The immediate examination may talk about either likenesses or contrasts. ) †¢ To acquire this point, the correlation must be made some place other than in the theory. . Examines in any event one purpose behind a similitude or a distinctio n distinguished in an immediate examination. †¢ Analysis (motivation behind why) must be identified with a similitude or a distinction in techniques for political control between the two realms. Subtotal 1 Point 7 Points  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. AP ® WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 †Comparative (proceeded) EXPANDED CORE (greatness) Expands past fundamental center of 1â€7 focuses. An understudy must acquire 7 focuses in the fundamental center region before winning focuses in the extended center territory. 0â€2 Points Models: †¢ Has a reasonable, expository and extensive postulation. †¢ Addresses all pieces of the inquiry completely (as pertinent): correlations, sequence, causation, associations, subjects, collaborations, content. †¢ Provides sufficient recorded proof to validate proposition. †¢ Relates correlations with bigger worldwide setting. †¢ Makes a few immediate, significant correlations between or among social orders. †¢ Consistently breaks down the circumstances and end results of important likenesses and contrasts. †¢ Applies significant information on different locales or world recorded procedures. †¢ Discusses change after some time (e. g. changing strategies for political control as the domains declined). †¢ Recognizes subtleties inside domains. Subtotal 2 Points TOTAL 9 Points  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. coll egeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. ollegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. AP ® WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING COMMENTARY Question 3 Overview The purpose of the inquiry was for understudies to pick two of the specified realms †Han China (206 B. C. E. to 220 C. E. ), Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B. C. E. to 550 C. E. ), Imperial Rome (31 B. C. E. to 476 C. E. ) †and look at the manners in which those realms applied political command over their peoples. Understudies were unequivocally advised to talk about the two similitudes and contrasts in techniques for political control. Test: 3A Score: 8 The article contains a substantial theory in the second and third sentences of the principal section (1 point). In the fourth passage, the exposition tends to a likeness (â€Å"Both domains had insecure borders†) and a few contrasts, including â€Å"However, Han China managed the Turkic Huns through the tribute frameworks, in this way mollifying them with endowments and keeping away from exorbitant costly fighting, which Rome favored when managing their enemies† (2 focuses). Despite the fact that there is plentiful proof for the Han, Roman proof is restricted by conversation of the Republic, which couldn't be checked. There is, in any case, enough proof for 2 proof focuses. Notwithstanding the immediate examination recorded above, there is another distinction at the base of the second section †â€Å"However, in light of the fact that there was less accentuation as an aggregate gathering in Rome, the political association was significantly less organized than China’s† †which earned 1 point for the correlation and 1 point on the grounds that the announcement additionally includes an investigation. This article contained an unpredictable theory, adequate profundity of examination, and supporting proof to acquire 1 Expanded Core point. Test: 3B Score: 6 This exposition contains a legitimate proposal in the principal passage (1 point) and addresses the two likenesses and contrasts (2 focuses). There is adequate proof for both the Mauryan/Gupta and the Han realms (2 focuses). The immediate correlation is found in the subsequent passage: â€Å"Han China and Maurya Gupta [sic] both solidified their capacity through military buildup† (1 point). The exposition endeavors examination in the close to the last section yet just dissects the Han: â€Å"Due to their absence of a dedicated religion, China had the option to absorb the Huns when they started to attack China. † There is no examination of a correlation of Han and Mauryan/Gupta strategies for political control. Test: 3C Score: 3 There is no substantial proposition in light of the fact that the exposition endeavors to show a contrast among Han and Rome as far as the Roman Republic, which is outside the timespan. The article just tends to likenesses, not substantial contrasts (1 point). The proof is adequate for the Han, yet the main legitimate bit of proof for Rome is the explanation that â€Å"He [Augustus] crushed Cleopatra and Mark Anthony ensuring that Rome is politically secured† (1 point). The greater part of the Roman proof is before 31 B. C. E. what's more, in this manner didn't acquire credit. The article has a substantial direct examination in the fourth passage: â€Å"The size of the two domains was an issue that prompted pioneers eventually losing political control of both empires† (1 point).  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. Step by step instructions to refer to Ap World History 2010 Q3, Papers

Compassion and Media Representations of Suffering Essay

Empathy and Media Representations of Suffering - Essay Example Empathy Cultivation The choice on how these pictures will be utilized and how a story will be advised are left to the choice of the writers and the editors. These choices are affected by various components which incorporate social norms of the essential crowd and the desires for publicists. The finished result is quite often equipped towards what will be justified as intriguing by more individuals so as to draw in more promoters. Media produce materials that bring out empathy since sympathy is the thing that calls crowd consideration. Media positions the crowd from a spectator’s perspective, a detached crowd that is frail with regards to the accomplishing something against the sufferings of casualties of catastrophic events and synthetic violations. To set up an increasingly close connection between the news content and the crowd, media utilize individual stories that are exceptionally centered around the regular citizens. Their misfortunes are featured, their tears take the s pots of real body tally and political examination. By putting taking care of the crowd the enduring of individuals who should be guiltlessness and the way that crowd can't successfully intervene the torment, the media makes far off misery. The crowd are being adapted to think about the state of outsiders a large number of miles away. This structure of far off enduring has been amazing to such an extent that it has associated governmental issues, crowd, and non-benefit associations towards one reason. The development of innovation has managed more news associations and even customary residents to get to and convey news and other data. The web has likewise extended the principles on the degree of enduring one may appear. All the more significantly, this persistent progression of data on enduring has elevated the audience’s empathy in light of the support of the way that they are eventually frail to change to anything and even with the benefit of knowing and watching, they can't do anything. The crowd isn't any longer permitted to disconnect themselves from the destiny of others or take asylum in numbness since they are never sheltered from the data. Empathy Fatigue Moeller (1999) accepts that this recipe is additionally the reason for sympathy weakness. The ceaseless drive to uplift feeling and touch off enthusiasm from the crowd is bargaining the very substance of news coverage. News-casting should maintain certainties and realities without preferring any side. News coverage is about data spread. These assume a mediocre position over productivity. As media organizations battle for crowd, they keep on upping the ante on how they present their accounts without intersection the legitimate limits. Thus, the media organizations resort to sentimentality. The outcome is the regularly developing worry on the precision of data that the crowd acquires and the correct feeling that news should inspire. Chouliaraki (2006) examined how experience news epitomizes this circumstance. She referenced three basic recent developments: shootings in Indonesia, a vessel mishap in India and ‘biblical floods’ in Bangladesh. These were given close to one moment of broadcast appointment. Significant data was likewise not referenced in the ‘breaking news’ divide and was not introduced in the best possible setting of the occasion. This treatment results to an absence of system for the crowd to comprehend the heaviness of the occasion. Th

Dining

Dining This is another one of those entries thats going to make admissions cringe when they see the title. Dining is the current hot topic at MIT for a variety of reasons, none of which Im going to touch. The long and short of it is that there are very few people on campus who can grasp exactly whats going on right now and its simply not responsible of me to talk about such a big issue when its currently in a state of development. What I will discuss is how the current dining system at MIT operates. That was one of my biggest questions about MIT, it didnt seem to be explained well in any of the material and it also seemed like a really critical issue. Probably my sketchiest prefrosh moment was due to a lack of dining understanding (thats a story for a later entry, or for Laura to write about). To fix this issue, I present to you everything you need to know about dining (for now!). There are six main options for getting food at MIT (more specifically, dinner), and they are: 1) House Dining Membership 2) Dining Dollars 3) Tech Cash 4) Cook! 5) Cash 6) Fraternities, Sororities, and Independent Living Groups Straight down, here we go: 1) House Dining Membership House Dining Membership (HDM) is about as close to a traditional dining program as you can get at MIT. A $300 dollar fee at the beginning of the semester goes towards all of your dinner purchases over the semester BUT . . . this does not mean free meals. HDM gives you 50% off all of your dinners, so you still have to pay, just not as much. There are 5 dorms that have dining halls where HDM is accepted: 1) Baker 2) McCormick 3) Next 4) Simmons 5) Ashdown If you live in any of these dorms, you are AUTOMATICALLY enrolled in the House Dining Membership and must participate in it. Generally, the dorms are open for dinner every night when theres school the next day (meaning no dinner on Fridays but there is dinner on Sundays). PROS If you eat more than $600 worth of dinner, youre getting a half price discount on everything you eat! CONS Most people, realistically, dont eat that much food. You essentially have to eat in the dining halls every night. People will argue with me about this, and of course there are exceptions, but its difficult to eat enough food to make this worth it. Especially when you factor in trips to Boston restaurants (a must) and various clubs and activities that will give you food. Also, walking to another dorm for food is an inconvenience, especially since dorms are kind of spread out (at least enough to be annoying). It feels weird not eating in your own home, surrounded by people you dont know. Realistically, it doesnt happen as often as MIT would hope. 2) Dining Dollars Dining Dollars is money you can load directly onto your student ID card. The Dining Dollars account can only be used in all dining halls, restaurants, food courts, cafes on campus, card reader-equipped vending machines and for late night pizza delivery from Dominos. PROS You know exactly how much money youre spending on food. You also wont be tempted to spend money from your ID card on anything but food. A good way for parents to budget money just for food for you. Its also very easy for parents to load Dining Dollars into an account for you! CONS Its an unnecessary division of funds unless you really dont trust yourself to allot money for food. 3) TechCash TechCash essentially turns your student ID into an on-campus debit card. Money on your TechCash account can be spent not only on food, but also on anything in La Verdes (the student convenience store in the student center), a hardware store down the street, random fundraisers you see in Lobby 10, yearbooks, class hoodies, the MIT bookstore, haircuts in the student center, and all sorts of other cool services. PROS You dont have to carry a bunch of cash around with you. Your ID card is all you need for most things youll be buying on campus. The money comes from your student account if youd like, making it a popular option for loans. Loans that cover books, food, and various other amenities often go into TechCash because its designed to let you purchase things that will help you in college. Its also very easy for parents to load a TechCash account for you! CONS Its not accepted everywhere. Sometimes youll need cash or debit cards, especially for trips into Boston. It can also be a pain if you dont carry cash and rely fully on TechCash. 4) Cook! A lot of the dorms without dining halls have kitchens. More specifically I believe Burton-Conner, East Campus, Random Hall, Senior House, and Bexley all have kitchens. Also, as mentioned in the comments below, apparently all dorms have some type of kitchen access if youre interested in cooking. A lot of students choose to live in these dorms in large part because of the kitchens and the freedom to cook what they want without being restricted to what the school feeds them. PROS How you eat is up to you. You can eat what you want, when you want. There is a grocery store with almost everything you need just down the street and there are normally plenty of kitchens or plenty of space for anybody whod like to cook. Dorms are often filled with the delicious smells of cinnamon buns, cookies, and soup. CONS A lot of college students (ME!) dont know how or have no interest in cooking. Cooking requires all of your own kitchen supplies and requires you to buy food at the grocery store (the one most frequented does NOT take TechCash). Cooking takes time and effort, something many people dont have the time or desire to do. 5) Cash Buy food on campus or in Boston with cash. Everybody takes cash! PROS Everybody takes cash so you have access to everything! CONS Parents cant fill up your cash! Also, carrying cash requires a wallet that can hold cash. You can also run out or not have enough. Loans dont really filter into cash, so any cash you spend is probably your own. 6) Fraternities, Sororities, and Independent Living Groups I dont know a lot about the FSILG dining options, but there appear to be a lot of people willing to answer questions about it in the comments. The gist of it is that many FSILGs offer dining plans if you choose to eat at their houses. Plans vary from house to house, so independent research would probably be the way to go, or just ask for help in the comments. NON-DINNER MEALS Since dining halls are dinner-only, most students will eat breakfast either at the student center, various food trucks or cafes, even at Sunnys Diner down the street. Ill leave lunch discussion for another entry (just because theres so much). BOTTOM LINE You want my advice? Ok, not just my advice, but also the advice of the people I live with and also many many many people Ive interacted with that are members of House Dining. Whats the advice? Avoid the House Dining Membership, avoid Dining Dollars, go with either cooking, TechCash, or cash, whichever youre more comfortable with. A lot of people who live in dorms that are forced into paying the $300 for House Dining are unhappy with the automatic membership because it restricts them to a dining hall every evening instead of giving them the freedom to eat elsewhere. Half the point of MIT is that its a great opportunity to experience as much as you can, including eating in as many places as you can. Dining Dollars is just an unnecessary restriction on an otherwise normal TechCash account. Anybody with a reasonable amount of self control would be better off with just TechCash, spending it only on food. Its there to bail you out if you need it (in case you need something other than food) but is available for food as well. Also, I dont know a single person who uses Dining Dollars (they probably exist though, just not en mass). Cooking is the heart and soul of many dorms here. BUT! You dont have to know how to cook to live in a dorm with kitchens. I live in Burton-Conner, a dorm with 6+ kitchens on each of its 9 floors. I cant cook. At all. I love Burton-Conner! I eat at the student center, I eat delivery, I eat in Boston, and sometimes Ill microwave some soup or some hot dogs. Food just isnt an issue, so no worries. MIT will likely get angry at me for suggesting that you avoid their dining memberships. Im sorry MIT, just sharing what I feel the most useful and most common sentiments are. The fact that a lot of people are unhappy with House Dining and try to avoid it is kind of a problem, which is why there is currently a ton of controversy on campus about the dining program. Parents seem to be concerned that there isnt a central dining hall or that kids dont have access to food (remember point number 1 in this entry?). Lack of central dining concerns a lot of students too. As I said earlier, having to travel to various dining halls in various dorms is kind of an inconvenience. At this point, your most economic and perhaps healthiest option is to purchase or cook your own food with your own money. Thats my suggestion, take it or leave it. Thats dining! Comment with questions, but Id like to request that no discussion of current on-campus dining negotiations occur in the comments. Nothing is concrete or finalized enough to publish. When everything is resolved, somebody will publish the result. UPDATE Ok, I revised some things and mentioned that all dorms have some type of kitchen or cooking facilities (I didnt actually know this). I also fixed the Dining Dollars mistake that Laura mentioned (again, I didnt know this). I mentioned lunch but dont really want to get into it because this was mostly to talk about dining plans and dinner. Again, Preferred Dining does not actually exist. Its now called House Dining Membership, but theyre essentially the same thing. If you read comments referring to Preferred Dining then they are actually talking about House Dining Membership. I mentioned FSILGS but dont know enough about the individual house plans to comprehensively talk about them so questions will have to be answered in the comments.